var other = [ 1, 2 ]
other = [other, 3]
var other = [ 1, 2 ]
other.push(3)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
spread operator | |
Push |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
spread operator | 33444446.0 Ops/sec |
Push | 62778500.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down what's being tested in the provided JSON benchmark.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is named "spread operator vs push" and its purpose is to compare two different methods for adding elements to an array:
...
)concat()
methodpush()
methodThese three methods are being compared because they serve a similar purpose but have different syntax, performance implications, and usage scenarios.
Options Compared
The two alternative approaches being tested are:
...
): Introduced in ECMAScript 2015, this operator creates a new array by spreading the elements of an existing array.Pros and Cons
Spread Operator (ES6)
Pros:
Cons:
Concat() Method
Pros:
join()
and slice()
to manipulate arraysCons:
Other Considerations
When choosing between these methods, consider the following factors:
Library and Special Features
There are no libraries mentioned in this benchmark. However, if the test case used any special JavaScript features like let
or const
, it would be good to note that these declarations were introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6).
Now, let's look at some alternative approaches:
Alternative Approaches
These alternatives would likely have similar performance characteristics to the spread operator and concat() method, but might offer different trade-offs in terms of syntax and usage scenarios.
Keep in mind that the best approach will depend on your specific use case and requirements. It's always a good idea to benchmark and experiment with different methods to find the most suitable one for your needs.