var arr = [];
for(let i=0; i<1000000; i++){
arr.push(i+0.111);
}
const nuArr = new Float32Array(arr);
const res = nuArr[100];
const len = arr.length;
const nuArr = new Float32Array( new Float32Array().BYTES_PER_ELEMENT * len);
for(i=0; i<len; i++){
nuArr[i] = arr[i];
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Constructorr | |
Loop |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Constructorr | 703.4 Ops/sec |
Loop | 40.7 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested.
What is being tested?
The provided JSON represents two individual test cases for measuring the performance difference between creating a Float32Array
using its constructor versus using a loop. The tests are designed to compare the execution time of these approaches.
Options compared:
Float32Array
instance directly using its constructor, passing an array as an argument.Float32Array
instance by iterating over an existing array and copying its elements into a new array.Pros and Cons of each approach:
Other considerations:
Float32Array
class, which is used to represent arrays of 32-bit floating-point numbers. This suggests that the benchmark is focused on performance in numerical computations.Library usage:
The test cases do not explicitly use any additional libraries or frameworks. However, it's worth noting that some JavaScript engines (e.g., SpiderMonkey) provide optimizations for Float32Array
instances that may affect the benchmark results.
Special JS feature/syntax:
There are no notable special features or syntax being used in this benchmark. The code adheres to standard JavaScript practices and does not utilize any advanced features like async/await, Promises, or modern language constructs (e.g., destructuring).
Other alternatives:
Alternative approaches for creating Float32Array
instances include:
ndarray.js
or typed-array
, which provide more efficient and convenient methods for working with arrays of numbers.Keep in mind that these alternatives are not explicitly mentioned in the benchmark definition and may require additional setup or modifications to the test code.