<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="test">
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="test">
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="test">
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
document.querySelector(".test")
document.getElementsByClassName(".test")?.[0]
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
querySelector | |
getElementsByClassName |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
querySelector | 2194322.2 Ops/sec |
getElementsByClassName | 2061792.9 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks.
Benchmark Overview
The provided benchmark measures the performance difference between document.querySelector
and document.getElementsByClassName
when used to select an element with a specific class ("test"
). The test case creates a nested DOM structure with multiple target nodes, ensuring that both querySelector and getElementsByClassName must traverse the DOM to find the desired element.
Options Compared
Two options are being compared:
getElementsByClassName
because it only traverses the DOM once and can stop early if no match is found.Pros and Cons
querySelector:
Pros:
Cons:
getElementsByClassName:
Pros:
Cons:
Library Usage
In the provided benchmark definition JSON, the document
object is used as a library. The document
object provides various methods and properties for interacting with the Document Object Model (DOM), which allows JavaScript code to manipulate HTML documents.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark. Both querySelector and getElementsByClassName use standard JavaScript DOM API methods.
Other Considerations
Alternatives
If you're interested in exploring alternative JavaScript libraries or frameworks for DOM manipulation and query selection, some popular options include:
These alternatives might offer performance benefits or more intuitive APIs, but they may also introduce additional dependencies and complexity.