let a = "a",
b = "b";
return a + b;
let a = "a",
b = "b";
return `${a}${b}`;
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
concatenation | |
template literal |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
concatenation | 70675056.0 Ops/sec |
template literal | 65837732.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.
Benchmark Purpose
The benchmark tests two approaches for concatenating strings in JavaScript: the traditional +
operator and template literals. The goal is to determine which approach is faster, more efficient, and easier to read.
Options Compared
There are two options being compared:
+
operator: This method involves using the +
operator to concatenate two strings.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
+
operator:Library/Feature Used
There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, template literals are a standard JavaScript feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6).
Special JS Feature/Syntax
Template literals use a syntax similar to string formatting in other programming languages, such as C# or Java. The syntax involves surrounding the desired content with backticks (``) and using ${}
to insert expressions or values.
Other Alternatives
If template literals are not supported or preferred, other alternatives for concatenating strings include:
join()
method: This method takes an array of strings as input and returns a single string by concatenating all the elements.Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics or use cases compared to template literals.
In summary, the benchmark on MeasureThat.net aims to determine which approach (concatenation using the +
operator or template literals) is faster and more efficient for concatenating strings in JavaScript.