var str = " abc";
str.trim().length > 2
/\S{3,}/.test(str)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
trim + length | |
regex test |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
trim + length | 24713008.0 Ops/sec |
regex test | 18774688.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.
Benchmark Definition
The provided JSON represents a benchmark definition, which outlines the testing scenario and expectations. In this case, we have two test cases:
trim + length VS regex
: This is the main benchmarking question. It asks whether the input string contains at least 3 non-whitespace characters in sequence.trim + length
regex test
The script preparation code and HTML preparation code are empty, indicating that no specific setup or configuration is required for this benchmark.
Test Cases
Let's examine each test case:
trim + length
:
This test case checks the performance of using str.trim().length > 2
to determine if the input string has at least 3 non-whitespace characters in sequence.
Pros: Simple and straightforward, leveraging built-in JavaScript methods.
Cons: May be slower due to method call overhead.
regex test
:
This test case uses a regular expression (/\\S{3,}/.test(str)
) to achieve the same goal as the first test case. The \S
character class matches any non-whitespace character, and {3,}
specifies that at least 3 of these characters must be present.
Pros: Can be faster due to the optimized nature of regular expressions. Cons: May require additional setup or configuration for some browsers.
Libraries and Features
The benchmark does not explicitly use a specific JavaScript library. However, it relies on built-in functions like trim()
and regular expression matching (/\\S{3,}/.test(str)
).
If the test case used special JS features or syntax, they would be described here. Since none are mentioned in this example, we'll move on.
Other Alternatives
Some alternative approaches to measuring performance for similar use cases could include:
String.prototype.match()
with a similar pattern.String.prototype.replace()
or String.prototype.indexOf()
.Keep in mind that these alternatives might not be directly applicable to this specific benchmark definition and test cases.