Benchmark: indexOf(needle) vs includes(needle) vs (needle in map) vs map.has(needle) (over 10,000 records)

Script Preparation code:

var array = []
for (var i=0; i<10000; ++i) {
  	array.push('00' + i)
}

function hasWithIndexOf(needle) {
	return array.indexOf(needle) !== -1
}

function hasWithIncludes(needle) {
	return array.includes(needle)
}

var map = new Map
array.forEach(item => map[item] = true)


var obj = {}
array.forEach(item => obj[item] = true)

function hasWithMap(needle) {
  return map.has(needle)
}

function hasWithIn(needle) {
	return needle in map
}

Tests:

array.indexOf
for (var i=0; i<100; ++i) { hasWithIndexOf('404'); }
map.has
for (var i=0; i<100; ++i) { hasWithMap('404'); }
array.includes
for (var i=0; i<100; ++i) { hasWithIncludes('404'); }
in obj
for (var i=0; i<100; ++i) { hasWithIn('404'); }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
array.indexOf
map.has
array.includes
in obj

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/92.0.4515.107 Safari/537.36 Edg/92.0.902.55

Browser/OS: Chrome 92 on Windows 7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
array.indexOf	894.6 Ops/sec
map.has	47314.1 Ops/sec
array.includes	26082.7 Ops/sec
in obj	48990.8 Ops/sec

indexOf(needle) vs includes(needle) vs (needle in map) vs map.has(needle) (over 10,000 records) (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: array.indexOf vs map.has vs array.includes vs in obj

Created: 2 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

array.indexOf

map.has

array.includes

in obj

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A