Benchmark: if/if VS if/or - MeasureThat.net

Script Preparation code:

var test = 'test5'

Tests:

if/if
if (test === 'test1') { return true; } if (test === 'test2') { return true; } if (test === 'test3') { return true; } if (test === 'test4') { return true; } if (test === 'test5') { return true; }
if/or
if (test === 'test1' || test === 'test2' || test === 'test3' || test === 'test4'|| test === 'test5') return true;
if/or double equal
if (test == 'test1' || test == 'test2' || test == 'test3' || test == 'test4'|| test == 'test5') return true;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
if/if
if/or
if/or double equal

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU OS 14_6 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/14.1.1 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1

Browser/OS: Mobile Safari 14 on iOS 14.6

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
if/if	1280524.6 Ops/sec
if/or	1279043.4 Ops/sec
if/or double equal	1273506.1 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'll dive into explaining the benchmark and its results.

**Benchmark Overview**

The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmarking test case, which compares the performance of two different approaches: if-else statements (if/if) and conditional expressions with OR operator (if/or). The benchmark is designed to measure how fast each approach can evaluate a series of simple conditions.

**Script Preparation Code**

The script preparation code is a variable `test` initialized with the string `'test5'`. This value is used as a constant input for the conditionals in both the if/if and if/or approaches.

**HTML Preparation Code**

There is no HTML preparation code provided, which means that the benchmarking test does not involve any DOM interactions or rendering of HTML elements. The focus is solely on evaluating the JavaScript expressions.

**Options Compared**

The two options compared are:

1. **If-else statements (if/if)**: This approach involves multiple separate if statements with a conditional return statement at each level.
2. **Conditional expressions with OR operator (if/or)**: This approach uses a single expression with an OR operator to evaluate all conditions simultaneously.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

* **If-else statements (if/if)**:
	+ Pros:
		- Can be more readable for complex logic or situations where the condition is specific.
		- Might be easier to debug due to the separate statements.
	+ Cons:
		- Requires multiple execute paths, which can lead to slower execution times due to branching.
* **Conditional expressions with OR operator (if/or)**:
	+ Pros:
		- Evaluates all conditions simultaneously, reducing the number of execute paths and potentially leading to faster execution times.
		- Can be more concise for simple conditional logic.
	+ Cons:
		- Might be less readable or harder to debug due to the single expression with multiple OR operators.

**Other Considerations**

In addition to performance differences, it's also worth noting that:

* **Simplification of comparisons**: The if/or approach uses double equals (`==`) instead of triple equals (`===`) for equality checks. This is generally considered less safe but can be acceptable in this specific microbenchmark where precision is not as critical.
* **Browser-specific behavior**: The benchmark appears to measure performance on a mobile Safari 14 browser, which might exhibit different behavior compared to other browsers or environments.

**Library Used**

There is no explicit library mentioned in the provided JSON. However, some libraries like `Benchmark.js` or `micro-benchmark` are commonly used for benchmarking JavaScript code.

**Special JS Features/Syntax**

This benchmark does not explicitly use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond basic conditional expressions and equality checks.

Related benchmarks:

if/if VS if/or (version: 0)

if/if VS if/or

Comparing performance of: if/if vs if/or vs if/or double equal

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

if/if

if/or

if/or double equal

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):