var temp = () => {
return;
}
temp();
if (typeof(temp) === "function") temp();
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
function | |
if typeof == function |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
function | 9799443.0 Ops/sec |
if typeof == function | 5309959.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark JSON and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is designed to compare two approaches: calling a function directly (temp();
) versus using an if
statement with the typeof
operator (if (typeof(temp) === \"function\") temp();
).
Options Compared
temp();
if
statement.undefined
, null
, etc.).if (typeof(temp) === \"function\") temp();
temp
is a function before calling it.typeof
operator and the conditional statement.Library Used None are mentioned in this specific benchmark. However, libraries like Lodash or Ramda might use similar patterns for functional programming or utility functions.
Special JS Feature/Syntax There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark. It's a straightforward comparison of two basic function invocation techniques.
Other Alternatives
If you wanted to add more alternatives to the benchmark, here are some ideas:
temp( arg );
if (typeof(temp) === \"function\") temp(arg);
(function() { return; }());
(function() { return; })();
These additional alternatives would allow you to test the performance impact of different function invocation patterns, including those that involve optional arguments or IIFEs.
The benchmark provides valuable insights into the performance characteristics of these two function invocation techniques. By comparing them, developers can make informed decisions about which approach is best suited for their specific use cases and performance requirements.