Benchmark: weeeeee - MeasureThat.net

Script Preparation code:

function f1(a1, a2, a3, a4, a5) {}

function f2(o) {}

Tests:

args
f1("1", "2", "3", "4", "5");
obj
f1({a1:"1", a2:"2", a3:"3", a4:"4", a5:"5"});

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
args
obj

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/91.0.4472.77 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 91 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
args	20547178.0 Ops/sec
obj	20826160.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and its test cases.

**Benchmark Definition JSON**

The benchmark definition JSON represents a simple JavaScript function `f1` that takes five string arguments (`a1`, `a2`, `a3`, `a4`, and `a5`) and does nothing (i.e., it doesn't return anything). There's also another function `f2` defined, but it only takes an object `o` as a parameter.

**Script Preparation Code**

The script preparation code is the JavaScript code that will be executed when creating the benchmark. In this case, two functions are defined: `f1` and `f2`.

*   The `f1` function is called with five string arguments ("1", "2", "3", "4", and "5") in the first test case (`"args"`).
*   The `f1` function is called with an object `{a1:"1", a2:"2", a3:"3", a4:"4", a5:"5"}` as its parameter in the second test case (`"obj"`).

**Html Preparation Code**

The html preparation code is empty, which means that no HTML or DOM-related code needs to be executed.

**Test Cases**

There are two test cases:

*   `"args"`: This test case calls `f1` with five string arguments.
*   `"obj"`: This test case calls `f1` with an object as its parameter.

Now, let's compare the options used in these test cases and discuss their pros and cons:

**Option 1: Passing individual values**

In the `"args"` test case, the individual values ("1", "2", "3", "4", and "5") are passed to `f1`.

Pros:

*   This approach is simple and easy to understand.
*   It's a common way to pass arguments to functions in JavaScript.

Cons:

*   When passing large numbers of values, this approach can lead to code duplication and maintainability issues.
*   If the order of the values matters (e.g., in a sorting algorithm), this approach may not be suitable.

**Option 2: Passing an object**

In the `"obj"` test case, an object is passed to `f1`.

Pros:

*   This approach can be more efficient and scalable than passing individual values.
*   It's useful when you need to pass multiple related pieces of data.

Cons:

*   The code needs to be modified to handle the object structure and access its properties correctly.
*   If the object is large or complex, this approach may lead to performance issues.

**Library usage**

There's no library used in these test cases. However, if a library was needed, some options could be:

*   `lodash`: A popular JavaScript utility library that provides functions for working with arrays, objects, and more.
*   `Moment.js`: A library for working with dates and times.

**Special JS feature or syntax**

There are no special features or syntax used in these test cases. The code is standard JavaScript.

**Other alternatives**

If you need to benchmark different scenarios or use a different programming language, some alternatives could be:

*   **Benchmarking libraries**: Libraries like `benchmark`, `js-benchmark`, or `microbenchmark` provide more advanced features and options for benchmarking.
*   **Parallel processing**: Using parallel processing techniques (e.g., using web workers) can speed up benchmarking.
*   **Different environments**: Testing on different operating systems, browsers, or devices can help ensure the code is compatible and performs well in various contexts.

Keep in mind that the best approach for your specific use case will depend on the requirements and constraints of your project.

Related benchmarks:

weeeeee (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: args vs obj

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

args

obj

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):