arrowFn = (a, b) => a + b;
fn = function(a, b) {
return a + b;
};
arrowFn()
fn()
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Arrow function | |
Normal function |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Arrow function | 15488297.0 Ops/sec |
Normal function | 15412181.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is comparing the performance of two types of functions in JavaScript: arrow functions and regular (non-arrow) functions.
Options Compared
Two options are compared:
=>
operator to separate the input parameters from the function body.function
keyword and has more verbose syntax.Pros and Cons
Arrow Function:
Pros:
Cons:
this
binding)Regular Function:
Pros:
Cons:
Library and Purpose
In this benchmark, the function
keyword is used as a library. The function
keyword provides a way to define custom functions in JavaScript.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
This benchmark doesn't use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond the comparison of arrow functions and regular functions. However, it's worth noting that other benchmarks might compare different JavaScript engines, optimizations, or feature implementations.
Other Alternatives
There are several alternatives to this benchmark:
I hope this explanation helps software engineers understand the purpose and implications of this benchmark!