let arrayTest = new Array(10);
for (let i = 0, l = arrayTest.length; i < l; ++i)arrayTest[i] = true;
let arrayTest = new Array(10).fill(true);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
For Loop fill | |
Array Fill |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
For Loop fill | 78917264.0 Ops/sec |
Array Fill | 15882080.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested, compared, and the pros/cons of each approach.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is designed to compare two methods for filling an array with a specific value: using a for
loop and using the Array.fill()
method.
Options Compared
for
loop to iterate over the array length, assigning a value (true
) to each element.Array.fill()
method, which sets all elements of an array to a specified value (in this case, true
) in a single operation.Pros and Cons
Array.fill()
method, especially for larger arrays, due to the overhead of incrementing a loop counter and assigning values individually.fill()
method.Library
The Array.fill()
method is a built-in JavaScript library function that fills an array with a specified value. Its purpose is to provide a concise and efficient way to set all elements of an array to a single value.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
There isn't any specific special feature or syntax mentioned in the provided benchmark definition. However, it's worth noting that the use of let
and const
declarations for variable assignment is a relatively recent JavaScript feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). The benchmark doesn't explicitly use these features, but they are commonly used in modern JavaScript code.
Other Alternatives
If you're looking for alternative approaches to filling an array, consider the following:
Array.prototype.forEach()
and setting a callback function with a return value to true
.for...of
loop or while
loop with incrementing indices.Keep in mind that the performance differences between these approaches may be negligible unless dealing with very large arrays.