var testData = {};
for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
testData[i.toString()] = "bla" + i;
}
const data = JSON.stringify(testData);
let str = "{";
Object.keys(testData).forEach((k) => {
str += "\"".concat(k).concat("\":\"").concat(testData[k]).concat("\",");
});
str = str.substring(0, str.length - 1);
str += "}";
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
JSON.stringify | |
string concat |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
JSON.stringify | 7334.3 Ops/sec |
string concat | 3722.7 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks!
The provided JSON represents a benchmark test case that compares two approaches for serializing an object to a string: JSON.stringify()
and manual string concatenation.
What is tested?
In this benchmark, we're testing how efficiently different browsers can concatenate strings. The test case creates a large object testData
with 1000 properties, each containing the string "bla" followed by the property's value (the loop counter).
The two test cases measure the execution time of serializing the testData
object using:
Options compared
The benchmark compares the performance of these two approaches, focusing on how quickly they can serialize the large testData
object.
Pros and cons of each approach:
Library used
The JSON
library is used in the JSON.stringify()
method. The JSON
object provides a way to serialize objects to strings, with options like pretty-printing and escaping.
Special JS feature or syntax
There isn't any specific JavaScript feature or syntax mentioned in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that the use of Object.keys()
and forEach()
is a relatively modern JavaScript feature (introduced in ECMAScript 2015).
Other alternatives
For serializing objects to strings, you could also consider using:
JSON.stringify()
.JSON.stringify()
.Keep in mind that the performance differences between these approaches can vary depending on the specific use case, browser, and dataset size.