var strB = "42";
var res =parseInt(strB);
var res =Number(strB);
var res = +strB;
var res = strB * 1
var res =parseFloat(strB);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
ParseInt | |
Number | |
+ | |
multiply | |
parseFloat |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
ParseInt | 10752385.0 Ops/sec |
Number | 10718670.0 Ops/sec |
+ | 27966088.0 Ops/sec |
multiply | 26490734.0 Ops/sec |
parseFloat | 10612814.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons.
Benchmark Definition: The benchmark defines five test cases to compare the performance of different operations:
parseInt(strB)
Number(strB)
+strB
(using the unary plus operator)strB * 1
parseFloat(strB)
Options Compared:
The benchmark compares the performance of these five options on a string literal "42"
assigned to the variable strB
.
Here's what each option does:
parseInt(strB)
attempts to convert the string to an integer.Number(strB)
attempts to convert the string to a number, which can be an integer or a float.+strB
uses the unary plus operator to coerce the string to a number. This works because in JavaScript, 0 + "42"
is equivalent to "42" * 1
.strB * 1
multiplies the string by 1, which has no effect and returns the original string.parseFloat(strB)
attempts to convert the string to a floating-point number.Pros and Cons:
Here's a brief summary of each option:
parseInt(strB)
: Pros - simple and efficient for integer conversions. Cons - fails if the string is not a valid integer, which may lead to errors.Number(strB)
: Pros - attempts to convert to a number, which can handle both integers and floats. Cons - slower than parseInt
because it has to perform additional checks.+strB
: Pros - efficient and works for strings that can be coerced to numbers. Cons - assumes the string is numeric and fails otherwise.strB * 1
: Pros - no effect on the original string, returns the original value. Cons - slower than multiplication by a non-zero number because it creates an intermediate result.parseFloat(strB)
: Pros - attempts to convert to a floating-point number, handles decimal strings. Cons - slower than parseInt
and may fail if the string is not a valid float.Library: None of the options use any external libraries.
Special JS Features or Syntax:
The only notable feature used in this benchmark is the unary plus operator (+strB
), which coerces the string to a number. This feature is widely supported in modern JavaScript engines and is often used for implicit conversion from strings to numbers.
Alternative Approaches:
If you wanted to write an alternative benchmark, you could consider adding more test cases, such as:
toString()
or valueOf()
on the result of each operationKeep in mind that the main goal of this benchmark is to compare the performance of different methods for converting strings to numbers, so it's essential to focus on those aspects.
By understanding the options compared and their pros and cons, you can make informed decisions about when to use each approach in your own JavaScript code.