Benchmark: Lodash "unionWith" "unionBy" "uniqWith" 5

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.10/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var users = [
  { 'name': 'barney',  'age': 36 },
  { 'name': 'pebbles', 'age': 5 }
];

var newUsers = [
  { 'name': 'fred',    'age': 40 },
  { 'name': 'barney',  'age': 36 },
  { 'name': 'pebbles', 'age': 2 }
];

for(let i = 0; i < 2000; i++) {
  var newUser = { 'name': 'user_' + i, 'age': Math.floor(Math.random() * i) };
  newUsers.push(newUser);
}

Tests:

uniqWith
const unionUsers1 = _.uniqWith(newUsers.concat(users), _.isEqual);
unionBy
const unionUsers2 = _.unionBy(newUsers, users, (user) => user.name);
unionWith2
const unionUsers1 = _.unionWith(newUsers, users, (newUser, user) => newUser.name === user.name);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
uniqWith
unionBy
unionWith2

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested.

**Benchmark Definition:**

The benchmark consists of two main functions from the Lodash library:

1. `unionBy`: This function returns a new array with elements from both arrays, filtering out duplicates based on a custom comparison function (in this case, the `name` property of each object).
2. `unionWith`, `uniqWith`, and `unionWith2` are variations of this function.

The benchmark creates two arrays: `users` and `newUsers`. It then uses these arrays to create new functions that perform union operations with a custom comparison function.

**Options Compared:**

Three options are being compared:

1. `unionBy`: This function filters out duplicates based on the `name` property of each object.
2. `unionWith2`: This function also filters out duplicates, but uses a different comparison function (`newUser.name === user.name`) to compare objects.
3. `uniqWith`: This function removes duplicate elements from an array without filtering on any specific property (i.e., it's not comparable).

**Pros and Cons:**

Here are some pros and cons of each approach:

1. **unionBy**: Pros:
	* Easy to implement
	* Fast performance
Cons:
	* Requires a custom comparison function, which can be brittle if not implemented correctly.
2. **unionWith2**: Pros:
	* More flexible than `unionBy` since it allows for more complex comparisons using the provided callback function.
Cons:
	* Slightly slower performance compared to `unionBy`.
3. **uniqWith**: Pros:
	* Simple and easy to implement
Cons:
	* Not suitable for filtering based on specific properties (e.g., `name`, `age`).
	* May be slower than `unionBy` or `unionWith2`.

**Library and Its Purpose:**

The Lodash library is a popular utility library that provides functional programming helpers, including the `_.uniqWith` function. The purpose of `uniqWith` is to remove duplicate elements from an array while preserving the original order.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax:**

There are no specific JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark that require special attention. However, it's worth noting that the use of Lodash library and its functions is a common pattern in JavaScript development.

**Other Alternatives:**

If you don't have access to the Lodash library or want to implement these functions yourself, here are some alternative approaches:

1. `unionBy`:
	* Use a simple array filter with a custom comparison function.
2. `unionWith2`:
	* Implement your own comparison function using JavaScript's built-in functions (e.g., `===`, `!==`, `includes()`, etc.).
3. `uniqWith`:
	* Use a simple array filter without any specific properties (i.e., just remove duplicates).

Here are some example implementations:

```javascript
// unionBy
function unionBy(arr1, arr2) {
  return arr1.filter((item1) => !arr2.includes(item1));
}

// unionWith2
function unionWith2(arr1, arr2) {
  return arr1.reduce((acc, item1) => {
    const match = arr2.find((item2) => item2.name === item1.name);
    if (match) acc.push(match); else acc.push(item1);
    return acc;
  }, []);
}

// uniqWith
function uniqWith(arr) {
  return arr.filter((item, index, self) => {
    const first = self.indexOf(item);
    return first === index;
  });
}
```

Keep in mind that these implementations may have different performance characteristics compared to using the Lodash library functions.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/91.0.4472.77 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 91 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
uniqWith	0.6 Ops/sec
unionBy	3253.0 Ops/sec
unionWith2	40.8 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Lodash "unionWith" "unionBy" "uniqWith" 5 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: uniqWith vs unionBy vs unionWith2

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

uniqWith

unionBy

unionWith2

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):