var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ];
var other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]
var other = [ 1, 2, params ]
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.prototype.concat | |
spread operator |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.prototype.concat | 3961671.5 Ops/sec |
spread operator | 28233222.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is comparing two approaches for concatenating arrays in JavaScript: the traditional concat()
method and the new ES6 spread operator (...
).
Options Compared
Two options are compared:
concat()
method....
): A new feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) that allows for more concise array creation by spreading elements from an existing array.Pros and Cons
...
): Pros:concat()
for creating new arrays from existing ones.
Cons:Library and Special JS Features
The test case uses a library, but none are explicitly mentioned. However, it's likely that the benchmark is using some basic JavaScript functionality, such as arrays and concatenation methods.
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax being tested in this benchmark.
Other Alternatives
For comparing array concatenation methods, other alternatives could include:
Array.prototype.push()
to concatenate elements.new Array(length)
versus creating an array with {}
and then pushing elements onto it.Benchmark Preparation Code
The provided JSON does not include any script preparation code. This suggests that the benchmark is expecting the JavaScript engine to perform the concatenation operations directly within the test case, without requiring any additional setup or initialization.