Benchmark: String concatenation-2021

Script Preparation code:

var stringArray = [
  "vsYjQhWW81jNQ7u",
"9KQsDJfCnT4JJrf",
"YMzWT1Uco2T9AB5",
"0zIgDBXDMZdieUl",
"4hItfhLfRD2hLIr",
"XYw1Yn8SgaBzinu",
"XTTahL0gbmFMdGn",
"P37CWiCns1khHEC",
"OX9y0sHujRn5PUw",
"6AbyX3ijO6P97YO",
"7bvsCc3ITvImtBN",
"P2sed2qtsAcnXzS",
"cBGbf19syg5NOTV",
"QyIS9bU2qR3JBIp",
"GPWyqNbSVrtPmtb",
"fY0efx4zYPQGDQI",
"9tuLr9O9rAdPzl4",
"KZBPVONDyhoyHza",
"Z5cp2YdqX1KXfKr",
"oVvcuBIwBK3UYpv",
"HAmCThLXToNd3Nu",
"0J6SewdwBHE84CX",
"ilksZKDvADAIadh",
"ruAMkLNbdVJhYWn",
"ee5jBvvjMuUDPc9",
"DbpaZ5DYi9Bd81Z",
"sNDzqXdt51Lr5mK",
"7fMDPfm2uXjBv4L",
"aycPYpmNRyeVZk3",
"zdK3VuV4M7Hpadi",
"p5Q1fRRT0d3fYBY",
"pxCCJbinLQkXnrp",
"uvIKNLhS2UCXBnj",
"ink06qCBXXrGuOC",
"4ZO4RrfTXZHoOUK",
"i00qnvR90HpNiav",
"ZHVLiMDvuUNpRxe",
"uJPMfad63OHKjti",
"dpws1715LWCC8C8",
"KEQ1GZKJ8Bc6Cnx",
"tMjEJx6z5aMUBuh",
"rXNqiz2zNKFuHcX",
"hYufOwpLqcQEuA2",
"YxEK8D2B5Zj6FWF",
"GzaMRURbhtPvsbs",
"dk48vbh36bTWoDh",
"ElOCc5EmYU0n0iF",
"IdrIh7WYyneiYSf",
"muqU7uRJpuHC8zo",
"q5pRbXWNHHioRXP"
];

var result = "";

Tests:

Plus operator
for (var i = 0; i < stringArray.length; i++) { result = result + stringArray[i]; } result=result+".";
using concat function
for (var i = 0; i < stringArray.length; i++) { result = result.concat(stringArray[i]); } result = result.concat(".");
using template literals
for (var i = 0; i < stringArray.length; i++) { result = `${result}${stringArray[i]}`; } result = `${result}.`;
Plus equal operator
for (var i = 0; i < stringArray.length; i++) { result += stringArray[i]; } result+=".";

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Plus operator
using concat function
using template literals
Plus equal operator

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Sumamry (model llama3.2:3b, generated 4 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks!

The provided JSON represents a benchmark named "String concatenation-2021". This benchmark tests how different methods of string concatenation perform in JavaScript.

**Tested options:**

1. **Plus operator (+)**: Concatenating strings using the plus operator.
2. **Using concat function**: Concatenating strings using the `concat()` method.
3. **Using template literals**: Using template literals to concatenate strings.
4. **Plus equal operator (=)**: Concatenating strings using the assignment operator.

**Pros and cons of each approach:**

1. **Plus operator (+)**:
	* Pros: Simple, widely supported, and efficient for small strings.
	* Cons: Can be slow for large strings due to string creation and copying.
2. **Using concat function**:
	* Pros: Fast, as it avoids creating a new string object each time.
	* Cons: Less readable than other methods, requires the `concat()` method, which might not be available in all browsers or environments.
3. **Using template literals**:
	* Pros: Fast and efficient, as it uses a single string object creation.
	* Cons: Requires support for template literals (introduced in ECMAScript 2015), less readable than other methods.
4. **Plus equal operator (=)**:
	* Pros: Simple and widely supported, but not as efficient as other methods.
	* Cons: Can lead to unexpected behavior if used incorrectly.

**Library/dependencies:**

In this benchmark, the `concat()` method is used, which is a built-in JavaScript function. No external libraries or dependencies are required.

**Special JS features/syntax:**

The benchmark uses template literals, which were introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). This feature allows for more efficient string concatenation using the `${}` syntax.

**Latest benchmark result:**

The latest results show that:

* Using `concat()` function is the fastest method.
* Using template literals is close behind, but slower than `concat()`.
* The plus operator (+) and plus equal operator (=) are the slowest methods.

Keep in mind that these results may vary depending on the specific JavaScript engine, browser, or environment used.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_13_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/92.0.4503.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 92 on Mac OS X 10.13.6

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Plus operator	31917.3 Ops/sec
using concat function	36304.1 Ops/sec
using template literals	34844.3 Ops/sec
Plus equal operator	22769.8 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

String concatenation-2021 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Plus operator vs using concat function vs using template literals vs Plus equal operator

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Plus operator

using concat function

using template literals

Plus equal operator

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Sumamry (model llama3.2:3b, generated 4 days ago):