<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/immutable/3.8.1/immutable.min.js"></script>
var list = Immutable.List();
for (var i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
list.push(i);
}
list.toArray();
list.toJS();
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
toArray | |
toJS |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
toArray | 22104306.0 Ops/sec |
toJS | 14523803.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark definition and test cases to understand what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition JSON
The provided JSON represents a benchmark named "toArray vs toJS" created on MeasureThat.net. The benchmark involves two JavaScript functions: toArray()
and toJS()
, which are part of the Immutable.js library.
Immutable.js Library
Immutable.js is a JavaScript library that provides a way to work with immutable data structures, meaning that once a value is created, it cannot be changed. This approach helps ensure thread safety and predictability in concurrent programming.
The two functions being tested are:
list.toArray()
: Converts an Immutable List object to a regular JavaScript array.list.toJS()
: Converts an Immutable List object to a plain JavaScript array.Options Compared
The benchmark compares the performance of these two approaches: using toArray()
and using toJS()
. The idea is to test which method is faster for converting an Immutable List object to a regular JavaScript array.
Pros and Cons
Here are some pros and cons of each approach:
list.toArray()
:list.toJS()
:toArray()
.Special JS Features
There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark. The focus is on comparing two different approaches for converting Immutable List objects to regular JavaScript arrays.
Other Alternatives
If you're interested in alternative methods for working with immutable data structures, consider the following:
Keep in mind that the choice of library and implementation depends on your specific project requirements, performance needs, and personal preference.