<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4/lodash.min.js'></script>
function native(values) {
return values.map(String);
}
function lodash(values) {
return values.map(_.toString);
}
native([42, "42", undefined, null, true, [], {}, function() {}])
lodash([42, "42", undefined, null, true, [], {}, function() {}])
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Native | |
Lodash |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Native | 6631579.0 Ops/sec |
Lodash | 4074013.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark measures the performance difference between two approaches: using the native String
constructor and using Lodash's toString()
method to convert values to strings. The test creates an array with various types of values (numbers, strings, undefined, null, boolean, arrays, objects, and a function) and benchmarks how long it takes for each approach to map these values to strings.
Options Compared
Two options are compared:
String
constructor: This method uses the native JavaScript String
constructor to convert each value in the array to a string. The native implementation is typically optimized for performance.toString()
method: This method uses Lodash, a popular utility library, to convert each value in the array to a string. Lodash provides a flexible and robust way to perform various string-related operations.Pros and Cons
Here are some pros and cons of each approach:
String
constructor:toString()
method:Library Used
The benchmark uses Lodash version 4. For those unfamiliar with Lodash, it's a popular utility library that provides various functional programming helpers, including string manipulation functions.
Special JS Features or Syntax
This benchmark does not use any special JavaScript features or syntax, such as async/await, Promises, or modern JavaScript syntax (e.g., arrow functions, template literals).
Other Alternatives
If you're interested in exploring other alternatives, here are a few options:
String
methods: Some browsers and engines have built-in string conversion methods (e.g., toString()
, valueOf()
), which might be faster than Lodash's implementation.Stringify()
method: V8, the JavaScript engine used by Google Chrome, has a custom Stringify()
method that can convert objects to strings more efficiently. However, this is not widely supported outside of V8 and Chrome.Overall, the benchmark provides a useful comparison between using the native String
constructor and Lodash's toString()
method for converting values to strings in JavaScript.