var arrayOne = new Array(180).fill(1, 0, 180);
arrayOne.slice(6, -2);
arrayOne.splice(6, arrayOne.length - 2 - 6)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
slice | |
splice |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
slice | 2636218.5 Ops/sec |
splice | 4330054.5 Ops/sec |
I'll break down the test case and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Purpose: The benchmark compares the performance of two ways to remove elements from an array in JavaScript:
arrayOne.slice(6, -2)
arrayOne.splice(6, arrayOne.length - 2 - 6)
In other words, it tests how fast each method can remove a subset of elements from an array.
Options Compared: The two options being compared are:
slice()
: Returns a shallow copy of a portion of an array.splice()
: Removes elements from an array and returns the removed elements.Pros and Cons:
slice()
: Pros:splice()
: Pros:Library Used:
In this benchmark, there isn't a specific library used explicitly. However, slice()
and splice()
are built-in JavaScript methods that don't rely on external libraries.
Special JS Feature/Syntax: There's no special JS feature or syntax mentioned in the benchmark. The code is straightforward JavaScript.
Now, regarding other alternatives:
array.prototype.map()
: While not directly used here, some people might consider using map()
to create a new array with the desired elements and then using filter()
to remove unwanted elements. However, this approach would have similar performance characteristics to slice()
, and it's generally less efficient.concat()
, set()
, or reduce()
are not typically used for removing elements from an array.Keep in mind that the choice of method depends on specific use cases, such as when the original array needs to be modified versus when a new array is preferred.