<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
function getRandomInt(max) {
return Math.floor(Math.random() * Math.floor(max));
}
var arr = [];
for(var i = 0; i < 5000; i++){
arr.push({value:getRandomInt(100)});
}
_.isArray(arr);
Array.isArray(arr)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
lodash isArray | |
Array isArray |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
lodash isArray | 167431040.0 Ops/sec |
Array isArray | 192303968.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and its components.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two approaches: using the Lodash library (_.isArray(arr)
) versus the native Array.isArray()
method in JavaScript.
Options Compared
There are only two options being compared:
Array.isArray()
method provided by the JavaScript language.Pros and Cons
Lodash with _.isArray():
Pros:
Cons:
Native Array.isArray():
Pros:
Cons:
Array.isArray()
.Other Considerations
The benchmark also considers the following factors:
Library and its Purpose
In this case, Lodash is used as a utility library for functional programming. The _.isArray()
function checks whether an object is an array, similar to the native Array.isArray()
method.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
There doesn't appear to be any special JavaScript feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that some modern JavaScript engines (e.g., V8) have introduced new language features and optimizations that may affect performance. If such features were being tested, they might impact the results.
Other Alternatives
Some alternative approaches to comparing array checking methods could include: