Benchmark: asados - MeasureThat.net

Tests:

adosad
Array.isArray([])
grgrwgerg
typeof([]) === 'object'

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
adosad
grgrwgerg

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.1:latest, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of microbenchmarks!

The provided JSON represents a benchmark definition on MeasureThat.net, which allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks.

**Benchmark Definition**

The "Name" field is set to "asados", but it doesn't provide much context. The "Description" field is empty, so we'll have to infer the purpose of this benchmark from the individual test cases.

**Individual Test Cases**

There are two test cases:

1. **Benchmark Definition**: `Array.isArray([])` => `typeof([]) === 'object'`
	* This test case compares two different approaches to determine if an array is empty.
2. **Benchmark Definition**: `Array.isArray([])` (same as above)
	* Another instance of the same test case, but with a different "Test Name" (`adosad`).

**What's being tested?**

In this benchmark, we're testing how long it takes for JavaScript engines to execute two different approaches to determine if an array is empty.

The first approach uses `Array.isArray()` method, which returns `true` if the given value is an array.
The second approach checks the type of the given value using `typeof()`, and asserts that its type is `'object'`.

**What options are compared?**

In this case, there's only one option being compared: `Array.isArray([])` vs. `typeof([]) === 'object'`. These two approaches are essentially equivalent in terms of determining if an array is empty.

**Pros/Cons and other considerations**

* Both approaches have the same outcome (i.e., they correctly determine if an array is empty).
* The performance difference between these two approaches might be negligible, especially for small arrays.
* However, if you're working with very large datasets or in performance-critical code, the choice of approach might matter.

**Other alternatives**

There aren't many other alternatives to compare here. If you need to check if an array is empty, `Array.isArray()` and `typeof([]) === 'object'` are two common approaches. You could also use a simple condition like `arr.length === 0`, but that would not be compared in this benchmark.

**Library/Feature Used**

No libraries or special JavaScript features are used in these test cases. The only method being used is `Array.isArray()` and the built-in `typeof` operator.

I hope this explanation helps you understand what's going on behind the scenes of this microbenchmark!

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_6) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/14.0.3 Safari/605.1.15

Browser/OS: Safari 14 on Mac OS X 10.15.6

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
adosad	4842909.5 Ops/sec
grgrwgerg	183956048.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

asados (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: adosad vs grgrwgerg

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

adosad

grgrwgerg

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.1:latest, generated one month ago):