<script type="text/javascript" src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.11/lodash.core.js"></script>
const a = 'Hello world!'
_.isString('Hello world!')
typeof 'Hello world!' === "string" ? true : false
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
_lodash | |
native |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
_lodash | 95297720.0 Ops/sec |
native | 103962520.0 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to help you understand the provided benchmark.
Benchmark Definition JSON
The provided JSON represents a benchmark for testing the performance of two approaches: using Lodash's isString
function and a native JavaScript approach using typeof
.
The main components of the benchmark definition are:
a
._.isString
function from Lodash, passing the string "Hello world!" as an argument.Options Compared
The two options compared in this benchmark are:
isString
function: This function takes a value as an argument and returns a boolean indicating whether the value is a string.typeof
: This approach uses the typeof
operator to check if the type of "Hello world!" is equal to "string". If it is, it returns true; otherwise, it returns false.Pros and Cons
Here are some pros and cons of each approach:
isString
function:typeof
:Library
The Lodash library is a popular utility library for JavaScript that provides various functions for tasks such as string manipulation, array processing, and more. In this benchmark, Lodash's isString
function is used to check if a value is a string.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax mentioned in the provided code. However, it's worth noting that some modern browsers support features like arrow functions (=>
) and template literals (${}
), which are not used in this benchmark.
Other Alternatives
If you want to test other approaches, you could consider the following alternatives:
_.toString()
).===
instead of typeof
).