Benchmark: r v s bench - MeasureThat.net

Tests:

regex replace all
const term1 = 'The quick brown fox'; const regex = /[ ]{2,}/gi; const term2 = term1.replaceAll(regex, " ");
split filter join
const term1 = 'The quick brown fox'; const term2 = term1.split(' ').filter(el => el.length > 1).join(' ');

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
regex replace all
split filter join

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/90.0.4430.72 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 90 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
regex replace all	3837405.2 Ops/sec
split filter join	3867003.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

**Benchmark Explanation**

MeasureThat.net is a platform for testing JavaScript microbenchmarks, allowing users to compare the performance of different approaches in various scenarios. The provided JSON represents two individual test cases.

The first test case, "regex replace all," tests the performance of regular expressions (regex) with the `replaceAll` method. Here's what's being tested:

* A string (`term1`) is defined with multiple consecutive spaces.
* A regex pattern (`/[ ]{2,}/gi`) is created to match two or more consecutive spaces.
* The `replaceAll` method is used to replace all occurrences of this regex pattern with a single space.

The second test case, "split filter join," tests the performance of string manipulation using the following steps:

1. A string (`term1`) is defined with multiple words separated by spaces.
2. The string is split into an array of words using the `split` method.
3. An array filter is applied to remove words with a length less than or equal to 1.
4. The remaining words are joined back into a string using the `join` method.

**Comparison Options**

The provided test cases demonstrate two different approaches:

1. **Regex-based approach**: Using regular expressions with the `replaceAll` method to replace all occurrences of consecutive spaces.
2. **String manipulation approach**: Splitting, filtering, and joining strings to remove words with a specific length criteria.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

* Regex-based approach:
	+ Pros:
		- More concise and readable code
		- Can handle complex pattern matching
	+ Cons:
		- May be slower due to the overhead of regular expression processing
		- Requires proper regex syntax and handling edge cases
* String manipulation approach:
	+ Pros:
		- Typically faster than regex-based approaches
		- More straightforward and easier to understand
	+ Cons:
		- Requires multiple steps, which can increase complexity
		- May be less concise than regex-based approaches

**Library Usage**

None of the provided test cases use any external libraries. The regex pattern is a built-in JavaScript feature.

**Special JS Features or Syntax**

The `replaceAll` method and the `split`, `filter`, and `join` methods are standard JavaScript features, but they may have variations depending on the browser or environment used. Additionally, the `gi` flag in the regex pattern indicates case-insensitive matching with global flags.

**Alternatives**

Other alternatives for string manipulation could include:

1. Using a library like Lodash or Underscore.js for more functional programming styles.
2. Employing more specialized libraries like regex-optimization tools or string processing utilities.
3. Exploring alternative data structures, such as arrays or objects, to optimize string manipulation.

However, for simple use cases like the provided test cases, JavaScript's built-in features and standard library should suffice.

**Benchmark Preparation Code**

The `Script Preparation Code` field is empty, which means that no additional code needs to be executed before running the benchmark. The `Html Preparation Code` field is also empty, indicating that no HTML preparation is required for this benchmark.

Related benchmarks:

r v s bench (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: regex replace all vs split filter join

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

regex replace all

split filter join

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):