Benchmark: filter vs foreach vs for

Script Preparation code:


var arr = [];
for(i=0; i<1000; i++){
  Math.random() > .5 ? arr.push({is_group: true}) : arr.push({is_group: false})
}

Tests:

double filter
const a = arr.filter(i => i.is_group)
forEach
const a = []; arr.forEach(i => { if (i.is_group) { a.push(i) } })
for
const a = []; for(i=0; i<1000; i++){ if (arr[i].is_group) { a.push(arr[i]) } }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
double filter
forEach
for

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/89.0.4389.128 Safari/537.36 Edg/89.0.774.77

Browser/OS: Chrome 89 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
double filter	235323.1 Ops/sec
forEach	200388.3 Ops/sec
for	6281.4 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark is comparing three approaches to filter an array in JavaScript:

1. `filter()`
2. `forEach()` with a conditional statement
3. `for` loop with a conditional statement

**Options Compared**

Here are the options being compared, along with their pros and cons:

* **Filter()**
	+ Pros: concise syntax, efficient (on average), easy to read.
	+ Cons: can be slower for large arrays due to the overhead of creating an iterator object.
* **ForEach() with conditional statement**
	+ Pros: allows for more flexibility in filtering, can be easier to understand than `filter()` for some cases.
	+ Cons: requires additional logic and checks, which can lead to slower performance.
* **For loop with conditional statement**
	+ Pros: provides direct control over iteration and filtering, can be faster for large arrays due to the overhead of function calls.
	+ Cons: more verbose syntax, harder to read.

**Library Usage**

None of the options use a library explicitly in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that `filter()` uses an internal implementation that creates an iterator object, which might be relevant for libraries or frameworks that optimize JavaScript performance.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

There are no special JS features or syntax used in this benchmark. The test cases only use standard JavaScript syntax and built-in methods.

**Other Considerations**

When choosing between these options, consider the following factors:

* Code readability: `filter()` is often the most concise and readable choice.
* Performance: For large arrays, `for` loops might be faster due to the overhead of function calls. However, this can depend on the specific use case and implementation.
* Control: If you need more control over iteration and filtering, a `for` loop with conditional statements might be a better choice.

**Alternatives**

Other alternatives for filtering arrays in JavaScript include:

* `map()`: similar to `filter()`, but returns a new array instead of modifying the original one.
* `every()` and `some()`: can be used to filter arrays, but often require more complex logic and are less concise than `filter()`.

In summary, this benchmark is testing three common approaches to filtering an array in JavaScript: `filter()`, `forEach()` with a conditional statement, and `for` loop with a conditional statement. Each option has its pros and cons, and the choice ultimately depends on code readability, performance, and control requirements.

Related benchmarks:

filter vs foreach vs for (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: double filter vs forEach vs for

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

double filter

forEach

for

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):