var string = "HelloWorld!".repeat(100) + " Hi";
for (let i = 0; i < 200; ++i) {
let result = '';
for (let j = 0; j < string.length; ++j) {
if (' ' === string[j]) {
break;
}
result += string[j];
}
}
for (let i = 0; i < 200; ++i) {
let j;
for (j = 0; j < string.length; ++j) {
if (' ' === string[j]) {
break;
}
}
let result = string.substring(0, j);
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Concat | |
Find & Substring |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Concat | 27.3 Ops/sec |
Find & Substring | 41.2 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to understand what is being tested.
What is being tested?
The website MeasureThat.net provides a platform for users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The provided benchmark tests two approaches to concatenate strings: using the +
operator (Concat
) and using the substring()
method (Find & Substring
).
Options compared:
Two options are compared:
+
operator to concatenate strings.substring()
method to find a substring within a string.Pros and Cons of each approach:
Concat (using +
operator):
Pros:
Cons:
Find & Substring (using substring()
method):
Pros:
+
operator, as it avoids creating temporary strings.Cons:
Library usage:
None of the test cases use any external libraries.
Special JavaScript features or syntax:
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in the benchmark definition. The focus is on comparing two simple string concatenation approaches.
Alternative approaches:
Other alternative approaches to string concatenation and substring extraction might include:
concat()
method (if supported by the browser): This method can provide a balance between performance and readability.In summary, the benchmark tests two common approaches to concatenating strings in JavaScript: using the +
operator (Concat
) and using the substring()
method (Find & Substring
). The test results can provide insight into which approach is more efficient for specific use cases.