var objs = [
{ first_nom: 'Lazslo', last_nom: 'Jamf' , pid: 4},
{ first_nom: 'Pig', last_nom: 'Bodine' , pid: 7},
{ first_nom: 'Pirate', last_nom: 'Prentice' , pid: 1}
];
objs.sort((a,b) => (a.pid > b.pid) ? 1 : -1);
objs.sort((a,b) => (a.pid - b.pid));
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Logical | |
Math Minus |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Logical | 1107322.0 Ops/sec |
Math Minus | 1171948.5 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested in this JavaScript microbenchmark.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark definition is a script that creates an array of objects (objs
) with various properties, including pid
. The script then defines two different sorting functions:
(a,b) => (a.pid > b.pid) ? 1 : -1
(a,b) => (a.pid - b.pid)
The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of these two sorting approaches.
Comparison Options
There are two options being compared:
if-else
clause) to determine the order of elements based on their pid
property.-
operator to subtract b.pid
from a.pid
, effectively performing an arithmetic comparison.Pros and Cons
if-else
clause and potential branching in the CPU.Library and Special JS Features
There is no specific library used in this benchmark. The sort()
method is a built-in JavaScript function, which means it doesn't rely on any external libraries.
No special JavaScript features are being tested or utilized in this benchmark. It's focused solely on the performance comparison of two sorting approaches using native JavaScript functions.
Other Alternatives
If you were to implement this benchmark yourself, you could consider adding additional test cases to compare other sorting algorithms, such as:
You could also explore testing different optimization techniques, such as:
Object.entries()
or other array methods to improve readability and performance.sort()
with and without the stable
option.