Benchmark: array find vs some please

Tests:

some
var a = ['hello', 'a', 'bc']; var b = a.some(item => item === 'hello');
find
var a = ['hello', 'a', 'bc']; var b = a.find(item => item === 'hello');

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
some
find

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 11_2_0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/89.0.4389.114 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 89 on Mac OS X 11.2.0

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
some	151195600.0 Ops/sec
find	151069792.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark compares two methods: `some` and `find`, which are used to search for an element in an array that satisfies a given condition.

**Options Being Compared**

Two options are being compared:

1. **Array.prototype.some()**: This method returns `true` if at least one element in the array passes the test implemented by its callback function.
2. **Array.prototype.find()**: This method returns the first element in the array that satisfies the provided testing function, or undefined if no elements satisfy it.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

1. **Array.prototype.some():**
	* Pros:
		+ Faster execution time for arrays with only one element.
		+ Can be more efficient for arrays where not all elements need to be checked.
	* Cons:
		+ May return `true` even if only one element satisfies the condition, which might not be desirable in some cases.
2. **Array.prototype.find():**
	* Pros:
		+ Returns the actual value of the first matching element, making it more useful for certain use cases.
		+ Can be faster than `some()` when only a single element needs to be found.
	* Cons:
		+ May throw an error if no elements satisfy the condition.
		+ Requires checking all elements in the array before returning.

**Library and Special JS Feature**

There is no explicit library used in these benchmark cases. However, both methods rely on the JavaScript language itself, leveraging its native array manipulation capabilities.

**Other Considerations**

When choosing between `some()` and `find()`, consider the specific requirements of your use case:

* If you only need to know if at least one element satisfies a condition, `some()` might be sufficient.
* If you need to find the actual value of the first matching element, `find()` is likely a better choice.

**Alternatives**

Other alternatives for searching elements in an array include:

1. **Array.prototype.every()**: Returns `true` if all elements pass the test implemented by its callback function.
2. **Array.prototype.indexOf()**, **Array.prototype.lastIndexOf()**: Return the index of the first (or last) element that satisfies a condition, or -1 if no elements do.

These alternatives offer different trade-offs between execution time and usage scenarios, which may be worth exploring depending on your specific needs.

The provided benchmark results show the performance difference between `some()` and `find()`, as measured by the number of executions per second. These results can help users better understand the relative efficiency of these methods in various scenarios.

Related benchmarks:

array find vs some please (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: some vs find

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

some

find

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):