Benchmark: set.has vs. array.includes of html input types

Script Preparation code:

var a = ["button",
"checkbox",
"color",
"date",
"datetime-local",
"email",
"file",
"hidden",
"image",
"month",
"number",
"password",
"radio",
"range",
"reset",
"search",
"submit",
"tel",
"text",
"time",
"url",
"week"];
var b = new Set(a)

Tests:

includes end
return a.includes("week")
lookup end
return b.has("week")
includes beginning
return a.includes("button")
lookup beginning
return b.has("button")

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
includes end
lookup end
includes beginning
lookup beginning

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.16; rv:86.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/86.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 86 on Mac OS X 10.16

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
includes end	13148480.0 Ops/sec
lookup end	56767940.0 Ops/sec
includes beginning	74164150.0 Ops/sec
lookup beginning	43569240.0 Ops/sec

set.has vs. array.includes of html input types (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: includes end vs lookup end vs includes beginning vs lookup beginning

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

includes end

lookup end

includes beginning

lookup beginning

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A