let arr = [1];
arr = arr.concat([2]);
let arr = [1];
arr = [arr, 2];
let arr = [1];
arr.push(2);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.prototype.concat | |
spread operator | |
Push |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.prototype.concat | 6210312.0 Ops/sec |
spread operator | 35629736.0 Ops/sec |
Push | 73683112.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and its test cases.
Benchmark Definition
The provided JSON defines a benchmark that compares three approaches to concatenate or append elements to an array in JavaScript:
Array.prototype.concat()
: The traditional method of concatenating arrays using the concat()
method....arr
): The new ES6 spread operator, introduced in ECMAScript 2015, which allows for concise array creation and manipulation.push()
method: The push()
method is used to add one or more elements to the end of an array.Test Cases
There are three individual test cases:
Array.prototype.concat
: This test case uses the traditional concat()
method to concatenate two arrays, [1]
and [2]
....arr
) to create a new array by concatenating [1]
and [2]
.push()
: This test case uses the push()
method to append the element 2
to the end of an array initialized with [1]
.Options Compared
The benchmark compares the performance of these three approaches:
Array.prototype.concat()
: Pros - widely supported, easy to use. Cons - can be slow for large arrays due to the overhead of creating a new array....arr
): Pros - concise, efficient, and modern syntax. Cons - may not be supported in older browsers or environments.push()
: Pros - simple, efficient, and widely supported. Cons - may not be as concise or readable as the spread operator.slice().concat()
or using a loop.Library
None of the test cases uses any libraries. They are self-contained JavaScript code snippets that demonstrate the three different approaches to array concatenation.
Special JS Features or Syntax
The only special syntax used is the spread operator (...arr
), which was introduced in ECMAScript 2015.
Alternatives
If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, consider the following:
slice().concat()
: This method creates a shallow copy of the original array using slice()
and then concatenates it with another array.for
loop or forEach()
to iterate over an array and append elements.These alternatives may not provide the same concise syntax as the spread operator, but they can offer more control and flexibility in certain scenarios.