var input = ["1","2","3","4","5",".","6","7","8","9","0"];
function noop () {};
input.forEach((char) => {if((char >= '0' && char <= '9') || char === '.') noop(); })
input.forEach(
(char) => {if(input.includes(char)) noop(); }
)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Comparison | |
Array.includes |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Comparison | 476408.2 Ops/sec |
Array.includes | 368077.7 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and some pros and cons of each approach.
Benchmark Purpose: The primary goal of this benchmark is to compare the performance of two approaches for checking if an element exists in an array:
includes()
method to check if a character (char
) is present in the input array.Options Compared: Two approaches are being compared:
includes()
methodPros and Cons of Each Approach:
Library Used:
The noop
function is used as a no-op function, which simply does nothing. This is likely used to prevent the benchmark from running for too long or interfering with other tests.
Special JS Feature/Syntax: There are two special features being used in this benchmark:
(char) => {...}
) instead of a traditional function declaration (function noop() {}
).includes()
method is called with a template literal (input.includes(char)
), which allows for more readable string interpolation.Other Alternatives: Some alternative approaches could be:
indexOf()
method, which returns the index of the first occurrence of the element in the array, or -1 if it's not found.every()
and includes()
, which can be used to check if all elements of an array satisfy a predicate (in this case, being present).test()
method.However, these alternatives might change the approach or syntax, so they are not being compared directly in this benchmark.