<script src="https://unpkg.com/fflate"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/pako/2.0.3/pako.min.js"></script>
var enc = new TextEncoder();
var a = new Uint8Array([Array(1000000).keys()]);
var b = enc.encode('The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog')
var ca = pako.gzip(a)
var cb = pako.gzip(b)
console.log(cb)
pako.inflate(ca)
pako.inflate(cb)
pako.deflate(a)
pako.deflate(b)
fflate.decompressSync(ca);
fflate.decompressSync(cb);
fflate.gzipSync(a)
fflate.gzipSync(b)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
unzip pako a | |
unzip pako b | |
zip pako a | |
zip pako b | |
unzip fflate a | |
unzip fflate b | |
zip fflate a | |
zip fflate b |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
unzip pako a | 170.2 Ops/sec |
unzip pako b | 29196.4 Ops/sec |
zip pako a | 47.2 Ops/sec |
zip pako b | 4643.8 Ops/sec |
unzip fflate a | 441.5 Ops/sec |
unzip fflate b | 819895.6 Ops/sec |
zip fflate a | 55.1 Ops/sec |
zip fflate b | 10962.3 Ops/sec |
Measuring JavaScript performance is an intricate task, and understanding the nuances of each benchmark is crucial.
Compression Libraries: Benchmark Overview
The provided JSON represents a benchmark test that compares the performance of two compression libraries: pako and fflate. The test uses JavaScript to create a large Uint8Array, encode it with both libraries, compress it using gzip, and then decompress the resulting buffers. The goal is to determine which library performs better in terms of execution speed.
Options Compared
The benchmark compares the following options:
Pros and Cons:
Library Considerations:
Special JS Features/Syntax (None)
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark. The focus is on comparing the performance of two compression libraries using standard JavaScript constructs.
Alternatives:
If you need to compress data in JavaScript, other alternatives include:
Keep in mind that each of these libraries has its strengths and weaknesses, and the choice ultimately depends on your specific use case and requirements.