eval("2 * 3");
Function("return 2 * 3")();
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
eval | |
new Function |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
eval | 2576884.5 Ops/sec |
new Function | 1383550.8 Ops/sec |
What is tested on the provided JSON?
The benchmark tests two different approaches to perform simple arithmetic operations in JavaScript:
eval()
: The eval()
function evaluates a string as a JavaScript expression and returns its result. In this case, it's used to calculate 2 * 3
.new Function()
: The Function()
constructor creates a new JavaScript function and executes it when called.Options compared
The benchmark compares the performance of these two approaches:
eval()
new Function()
Pros and Cons of each approach:
eval()
:new Function()
:eval()
, as it compiles the expression into an anonymous function before execution.Library
There is no external library used in this benchmark. Both eval()
and new Function()
are built-in JavaScript functions.
Special JS feature or syntax
None mentioned, but it's worth noting that the use of eval()
and Function()
can be considered a legacy approach in modern JavaScript development, as newer approaches like arrow functions (() =>
) or template literals (${expression}
) are generally recommended for simple expressions.
Other alternatives
If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, here are some options:
(x) => x * 3
(similar to new Function()
but with improved syntax)x * 3
2 * 3
These alternatives may offer better performance or security benefits compared to the original eval()
and Function()
approaches. However, they may require changes to your code's implementation.
Please let me know if you have any further questions!