<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.20/lodash.min.js"></script>
var sampleObject = {
"id": "0001",
"type": "donut",
"name": "Cake",
"ppu": 0.55
};
var sampleObject2 = Object.create(null);
var sampleObject3 = null;
var sampleObject4 = 100;
class Foo {
constructor() {
this.a = 1;
}
}
var sampleObject5 = new Foo();
function isObject(any) {
return
(
any != null &&
(any.constructor === Object ||
(typeof any === 'object' && Object.getPrototypeOf(any) === null))
)
}
_.isPlainObject(sampleObject);
_.isPlainObject(sampleObject2);
_.isPlainObject(sampleObject3);
_.isPlainObject(sampleObject4);
_.isPlainObject(sampleObject5);
isObject(sampleObject);
isObject(sampleObject2);
isObject(sampleObject3);
isObject(sampleObject4);
isObject(sampleObject5);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Lodash isPlainObject | |
JS Type Check |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Lodash isPlainObject | 532042.6 Ops/sec |
JS Type Check | 1146496.2 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark measures the performance of two approaches to check if an object is plain (i.e., not an instance of a constructor function). The first approach uses Lodash's isPlainObject
function, while the second approach defines a custom isObject
function.
Lodash's isPlainObject
Function
Cons:
* Requires loading the entire Lodash library, which may not be desirable for small applications or those with tight performance requirements.
* May incur additional overhead due to the use of a third-party library.
Custom isObject
Function
Cons:
* Requires manual implementation, which can lead to potential errors if not done correctly.
* May not be as efficient as using a well-tested library like Lodash.
Other Considerations
Foo
) and null
values. This helps ensure that the code handles these cases correctly, which is essential for robustness.isObject
function uses type coercion to check if an object has no prototype chain. This approach may be faster but also introduces potential pitfalls due to the complexity of JavaScript's type system.Benchmark Results
The latest benchmark results show that the custom isObject
function performs slightly better than Lodash's isPlainObject
in this specific test case, likely due to reduced overhead from loading an external library. However, the performance difference may not be significant for most use cases.
When deciding between these approaches, consider the trade-offs between simplicity, maintainability, and performance. If you need robustness, readability, and a reliable library, Lodash's isPlainObject
might be the better choice. If you prioritize low overhead, custom implementation, and fine-grained control, the isObject
function could be suitable for your specific needs.