document.getElementById('app');
document.app;
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
getElementById | |
document |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
getElementById | 1640263.0 Ops/sec |
document | 2938754.2 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what is tested, along with the pros and cons of each approach.
What is being tested?
The benchmark compares the performance of two ways to access an HTML element: using document.getElementById()
(the traditional way) versus document.app;
(an invalid syntax).
Options compared:
document.getElementById('app')
document.app;
Other considerations:
Library usage:
There is no library mentioned in this benchmark. The document
object is a built-in API provided by web browsers.
Special JS feature or syntax:
The test uses invalid syntax (document.app;
) to intentionally test the performance of an unsupported method. This allows the developer to gauge the impact of using non-standard approaches on browser performance.
Now, let's look at some alternative benchmarks:
document.querySelector()
instead of document.getElementById()
.document.getElementById('app').cache
vs. no caching).In general, benchmarks should strive to measure specific aspects of a system's behavior and isolate variables to draw meaningful conclusions about performance characteristics.