var data = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9];
var f32 = new Float32Array(data);
var copy = new Float32Array(32).set(4, f32.subarray(10, 20));
var copy = new Float32Array(32).set(4, f32.slice(10, 20));
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
subarray set | |
slice set |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
subarray set | 831701.4 Ops/sec |
slice set | 962977.4 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.
The provided benchmark is comparing three approaches to create a subset of an array: slice
, subarray
, and set
. The test case uses a large dataset stored in a Float32Array, which is a typed array that stores 32-bit floating-point numbers.
Options being compared:
slice()
: Returns a new array that contains a section of the original array.subarray()
: Returns a new typed array that contains a section of the original array.set()
: Sets the values in a new typed array to match the values in the original array.Pros and cons of each approach:
slice()
: Pros:subarray()
**: Pros:slice()
for large arrays, as it works directly with typed arrays.slice()
, as it doesn't create a new untyped array.
Cons:slice()
.set()
**: Pros:slice()
or subarray()
.Library used:
The benchmark uses the Float32Array
class from the JavaScript standard library, which is a typed array that stores 32-bit floating-point numbers. This library provides a fast and efficient way to manipulate numerical data in JavaScript.
No other libraries are mentioned in the provided code or benchmark definition.
Special JS feature/syntax:
The benchmark uses a special syntax for creating a subset of an array called "substring access" (introduced in ECMAScript 2015). This allows accessing a portion of an array using square brackets []
, like arr[10]
. However, this syntax is only supported in modern browsers that support ECMAScript 2015 or later.
The benchmark code uses subarray()
and slice()
, which are supported in most modern browsers. The set()
method uses the typed array's underlying buffer, which is not dependent on this special syntax.
In summary, MeasureThat.net is comparing three approaches to create a subset of an array: slice()
, subarray()
, and set()
. Each approach has its pros and cons, and the benchmark aims to determine which one is the fastest and most memory-efficient for large arrays.