const arrayOne = [1, 2, 3];
const arrayTwo = [4, 5, 6];
arrayOne.splice(0, 0, arrayTwo);
const arrayOne = [1, 2, 3];
const arrayTwo = [4, 5, 6];
const arrayConcat = arrayOne.concat(arrayTwo);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Splice + Spread | |
Concat |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Splice + Spread | 5860577.5 Ops/sec |
Concat | 4847324.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what is being tested, compared, and their pros/cons.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark tests two ways of concatenating arrays in JavaScript:
splice()
method to remove elements from an array and then inserts a new value using the spread operator (...
).concat()
function to concatenate two arrays.Library Used
There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition or individual test cases. However, it's worth noting that both splice()
and concat()
are built-in JavaScript methods.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
Neither of the methods uses any special JavaScript features or syntax. They are both standard array manipulation techniques.
Pros and Cons
Here's a brief summary of each approach:
splice()
+ spread for large arrays due to the creation of a new array object.Other Alternatives
Other alternatives for concatenating arrays in JavaScript include:
Array.from()
to create a new array from an iterable (e.g., another array or string) and then spreads the elements using the spread operator (...
).Benchmark Preparation Code
Since there is no preparation code provided in the benchmark definition, it's assumed that the test cases are self-contained and do not require any additional setup or modifications.
Individual Test Cases
Each individual test case represents a single iteration of the benchmark. The first test case uses splice()
+ spread to concatenate two arrays, while the second test case uses concat()
. These test cases are likely repeated multiple times to ensure accurate results for each browser and platform combination.
The latest benchmark result shows that Splice + Spread performed better than Concat on a specific configuration (Chrome 88 on Linux). However, without more context or information about the specific hardware and software environments tested, it's difficult to determine if this is representative of the performance differences between these methods in all cases.