Benchmark: Splice+Spread vs concat to concat arrays

Tests:

Splice + Spread
const arrayOne = [1, 2, 3]; const arrayTwo = [4, 5, 6]; arrayOne.splice(0, 0, ...arrayTwo);
Concat
const arrayOne = [1, 2, 3]; const arrayTwo = [4, 5, 6]; const arrayConcat = arrayOne.concat(arrayTwo);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Splice + Spread
Concat

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/88.0.4324.96 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 88 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Splice + Spread	5860577.5 Ops/sec
Concat	4847324.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what is being tested, compared, and their pros/cons.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark tests two ways of concatenating arrays in JavaScript:

1. **Splice + Spread**: This method uses the `splice()` method to remove elements from an array and then inserts a new value using the spread operator (`...`).
2. **Concat**: This method uses the `concat()` function to concatenate two arrays.

**Library Used**

There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition or individual test cases. However, it's worth noting that both `splice()` and `concat()` are built-in JavaScript methods.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

Neither of the methods uses any special JavaScript features or syntax. They are both standard array manipulation techniques.

**Pros and Cons**

Here's a brief summary of each approach:

1. **Splice + Spread**
	* Pros:
		+ Can be faster for large arrays since it modifies the original array in place.
		+ Reduces memory allocation since the new value is inserted into the existing array.
	* Cons:
		+ May have performance issues if the array is not properly aligned, leading to slow indexing.
		+ Can lead to unexpected behavior if not handled carefully (e.g., modifying the original array while iterating over it).
2. **Concat**
	* Pros:
		+ Easy to understand and implement for those familiar with array concatenation.
		+ Does not modify the original array, preserving its integrity.
	* Cons:
		+ Creates a new array object, which can lead to increased memory allocation and garbage collection overhead.
		+ Can be slower than `splice()` + spread for large arrays due to the creation of a new array object.

**Other Alternatives**

Other alternatives for concatenating arrays in JavaScript include:

1. **Array.prototype.push()**: This method appends elements to an array, which can be more efficient for large arrays.
2. **Array.from() and ...**: This method uses `Array.from()` to create a new array from an iterable (e.g., another array or string) and then spreads the elements using the spread operator (`...`).
3. **Destructuring assignment**: This method uses destructuring assignment to extract values from an array, which can be more efficient for small arrays.

**Benchmark Preparation Code**

Since there is no preparation code provided in the benchmark definition, it's assumed that the test cases are self-contained and do not require any additional setup or modifications.

**Individual Test Cases**

Each individual test case represents a single iteration of the benchmark. The first test case uses `splice()` + spread to concatenate two arrays, while the second test case uses `concat()`. These test cases are likely repeated multiple times to ensure accurate results for each browser and platform combination.

The latest benchmark result shows that **Splice + Spread** performed better than **Concat** on a specific configuration (Chrome 88 on Linux). However, without more context or information about the specific hardware and software environments tested, it's difficult to determine if this is representative of the performance differences between these methods in all cases.

Related benchmarks:

Splice+Spread vs concat to concat arrays (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Splice and Spread vs Concat to concatenate arrays

Comparing performance of: Splice + Spread vs Concat

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Splice + Spread

Concat

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):