var obj = {
"data": [{
"type": "articles",
"id": "1",
"attributes": {
"title": "JSON API paints my bikeshed!",
"body": "The shortest article. Ever.",
"created": "2015-05-22T14:56:29.000Z",
"updated": "2015-05-22T14:56:28.000Z"
},
"relationships": {
"author": {
"data": {"id": "42", "type": "people"}
}
}
}],
"included": [
{
"type": "people",
"id": "42",
"attributes": {
"name": "John",
"age": 80,
"gender": "male"
}
}
]
}
var pobj = JSON.stringify(obj);
console.log(JSON.parse(pobj));
console.log(obj);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
1 | |
2 |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
1 | 51950.6 Ops/sec |
2 | 109302.9 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON data and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark definition consists of two test cases:
obj
) to a string using JSON.stringify()
and then parsing that string back into an object using JSON.parse()
. The original object is not modified during this process.obj
) to the console.Comparison of Options
The two options being compared are:
Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Serializing an Object to a String and Parsing It Back
Pros:
Cons:
Logging an Object Directly to the Console
Pros:
Cons:
Library Used
In both test cases, the JSON
library is used for serialization and deserialization. The JSON.stringify()
function converts an object to a string, while JSON.parse()
reverses this process.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax being tested in these benchmarks. They focus on comparing two common scenarios: serializing and parsing data, and logging objects directly to the console.
Other Alternatives
If you wanted to add more test cases, you could consider exploring other approaches, such as:
By adding more test cases and exploring different scenarios, you can gain a deeper understanding of the trade-offs involved in choosing an optimal approach for your specific use case.