var sortTypeSelected = "Created: Oldest";
var SortTypes = {
AlphaUp: "Company Name: A-Z",
AlphaDown: "Company Name: Z-A",
Created: "Created: Oldest",
Updated: "Updated: Latest",
};
( sortTypeSelected === SortTypes.Created || sortTypeSelected === SortTypes.Updated )
[SortTypes.Created, SortTypes.Updated ].includes( sortTypeSelected )
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Compare string-to-value | |
Compare valueArray-to-string |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Compare string-to-value | 6827492.0 Ops/sec |
Compare valueArray-to-string | 4371970.0 Ops/sec |
Benchmark Explanation
The provided JSON represents a benchmark test on MeasurThat.net, comparing the performance of two approaches to determine if a string matches a specific sorting order.
Approaches Compared
There are two approaches being compared:
sortTypeSelected
variable is equal to one of the values in the SortTypes
object.sortTypeSelected
variable is included in an array of values from the SortTypes
object.Options Compared
The two approaches are compared by executing the corresponding JavaScript code. The benchmark results show that the "Compare string-to-value" test has a higher number of executions per second than the "Compare valueArray-to-string" test.
Pros and Cons
Library and Purpose
There is no explicit library mentioned in the provided JSON. However, it's likely that the SortTypes
object is a custom object created by the benchmark author.
Special JS Features/Syntax
The benchmark uses JavaScript variables (var
, sortTypeSelected
) and array notation ([SortTypes.Created, SortTypes.Updated].includes( sortTypeSelected )
). These are standard features of modern JavaScript, but not explicitly mentioned in the explanation for wider audiences.
Other Alternatives
If the "Compare string-to-value" or "Compare valueArray-to-string" approaches were not used, alternative methods could include:
However, these alternatives are not explicitly mentioned in the provided JSON or benchmark results.