var aNumbers = [0,1,2,3];
aNumbers.unshift(4)
[4].concat(aNumbers)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Unshift | |
Concat |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Unshift | 2735.2 Ops/sec |
Concat | 414.9 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and its components.
Benchmark Definition:
The benchmark measures how fast two approaches are to add a value in the first position of an array. The arrays are defined as aNumbers = [0,1,2,3];
.
Options Compared:
Two options are compared:
Pros and Cons of Each Approach:
Unshift:
Pros:
Cons:
Concat:
Pros:
Cons:
Library Usage:
None of the test cases use any external libraries. Both options rely on built-in JavaScript methods (unshift()
and concat()
).
Special JS Features/Syntax:
None are explicitly mentioned or required for these two test cases. However, keep in mind that modern JavaScript versions (e.g., ECMAScript 2015+) introduced more efficient array methods like set()
, which might be worth exploring in other benchmarks.
Other Alternatives:
For adding a value to the first position of an array, some developers may also consider using:
However, in this specific benchmark, the focus is on comparing unshift() with concat(), which are the most common approaches.
Now that you've taken a deep breath, I hope this explanation helps!