var listOfNumbers = Array(10000).fill().reduce((acc, x, i) => (acc.push(i), acc), []);
var a = listOfNumbers.reduce((acc, x) => { acc[x] = x * 2; return acc; }, {});
var b = listOfNumbers.reduce((acc, x) => Object.assign(acc, { [x]: x * 2 }), {});
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Direct assignment | |
Object.assign |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Direct assignment | 18269.8 Ops/sec |
Object.assign | 335.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
What is being tested?
The benchmark compares two approaches to assign properties to an object:
[]
syntax) to dynamically assign properties to an object, like obj[x] = x * 2
.Object.assign()
method to assign properties to an object, like Object.assign(obj, { [x]: x * 2 })
.Options compared
The benchmark is comparing two options:
Pros and Cons of each approach:
Direct Assignment (using bracket notation)
Pros:
Object.assign()
Cons:
Object.assign()
Pros:
Cons:
Library usage:
The benchmark doesn't use any external libraries, so no additional dependencies are involved.
Special JS feature or syntax:
This benchmark uses bracket notation ([]
syntax) for dynamic property assignment, which is a common JavaScript syntax. There's no specific "special" feature being tested here; it's just a typical scenario that can be encountered in many JavaScript applications.
Other alternatives:
If you're looking for alternative approaches to assign properties to an object, some other options include:
Object.defineProperty()
with a getter and setterArray.prototype.forEach()
or Array.prototype.reduce()
with the set
method (for older browsers that don't support modern methods)JSON.parse()
and JSON.stringify()
with objects (not recommended due to performance issues)Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different trade-offs in terms of performance, memory usage, and browser compatibility.