var array = [1, 2, 3, 4];
array.push(5);
array[array.length] = 5;
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.prototype.push | |
Access Index |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.prototype.push | 7100757.5 Ops/sec |
Access Index | 3980926.0 Ops/sec |
Benchmark Explanation
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmarking test case on the MeasureThat.net website. The benchmark tests the performance of two approaches:
array[array.length]
and assigns a new value to it.Options Compared
The benchmark compares the performance of these two approaches:
Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Pros:
Array.prototype.push
is a common and idiomatic JavaScript pattern, making the code more readable.Cons:
push
method creates a new array object, copies the old elements to it, and then updates the length of the original array. This can be slower than accessing an element directly.Pros:
Array.prototype.push
because it avoids the overhead of creating a new array object.Cons:
Library Usage
There is no explicit library mentioned in the provided JSON. However, some libraries like Lodash or Array.prototype methods might be used in real-world scenarios for similar operations.
Special JavaScript Features/Syntax
This benchmark does not explicitly use any special JavaScript features or syntax. It only tests basic array operations.
Alternative Approaches
If you need to optimize array push performance, consider the following alternatives:
Array.prototype.splice()
: Instead of using push()
, you can use splice()
with an offset of 0 and a count of 1 to add an element to the end of the array.Int32Array
or Float64Array
for more efficient memory allocation.Keep in mind that the best approach depends on your specific use case and requirements. Always consider factors like code readability, maintainability, and performance when choosing an optimization technique.