var objects = Array.from(new Array(1000)).map((r, i) => ({
id: `id-${i}`,
val: i
}));
// Output should be
// { "id-0": 0, "id-1": 1, ... }
var newMapFE = {};
objects.forEach(o => { newMapFE[o.id] = o.val })
objects.reduce((acc, item) => ({acc, [item.id]: item.val}), {});
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Populate object via ForEach | |
Populate object via Reduce |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Populate object via ForEach | 36952.2 Ops/sec |
Populate object via Reduce | 19.0 Ops/sec |
Benchmark Overview
MeasureThat.net is a platform that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The provided benchmark compares two approaches to creating new objects in JavaScript: using the forEach
method versus the reduce
method.
Test Cases
There are two test cases:
forEach
method to populate a new object with properties from an array of objects.reduce
method to populate a new object with properties from an array of objects.Options Compared
The two options are:
forEach
to create a new objectreduce
to create a new objectPros and Cons of Each Approach
Using forEach
:
Pros:
Cons:
Using reduce
:
Pros:
forEach
.Cons:
Library Usage
In this benchmark, no libraries are explicitly mentioned. However, the use of Array.from()
suggests that modern JavaScript features and built-in methods are being utilized.
Special JS Features/Syntax
There is no specific mention of special JavaScript features or syntax in the provided information. The code uses standard JavaScript constructs and features available in most modern browsers.
Alternative Approaches
Other approaches to creating new objects might include:
for
loop: Similar to forEach
, but with more explicit control over iteration.map()
: Creates a new array with transformed elements, which can be used to create objects.Keep in mind that these alternatives might not provide a direct comparison to the forEach
and reduce
approaches, as they often involve different trade-offs between conciseness, readability, and performance.