Benchmark: testing power - MeasureThat.net

Tests:

** 1
6 ** 21
** 2
21 ** 6

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
** 1
** 2

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 8.1.0; Mi A1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/89.0.4389.128 Mobile Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome Mobile 89 on Android 8.1.0

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
** 1	171755120.0 Ops/sec
** 2	172513504.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Measuring the performance of JavaScript microbenchmarks is crucial to understand how different browsers and devices handle various mathematical operations.

**Benchmark Definition**
The provided Benchmark Definition JSON defines two test cases:

* `6 ** 21`
* `21 ** 6`

Both tests measure the exponentiation operation (`**`) with base values 6 and 21, respectively. The goal is to determine which order (e.g., `6 ** 21` vs. `21 ** 6`) results in faster execution.

**Options Compared**
The main options being compared are:

* Exponentiation order: `a ** b` (base ** exponent) vs. `b ** a` (exponent ** base)
* The effect of different browsers and devices on performance

**Pros and Cons**

* **Exponentiation Order**: Using the correct order can significantly impact performance. In this case, using the higher value as the base might be faster because it reduces the number of iterations required to calculate the result.
	+ Pros: Can lead to significant performance gains
	+ Cons: Might not always be the fastest approach, and different browsers may optimize differently
* **Browser and Device Variability**: Comparing performance across different browsers and devices can help identify which configurations are most efficient.
	+ Pros: Provides valuable insights into real-world performance scenarios
	+ Cons: Can be challenging to reproduce consistent results due to varying hardware and software configurations

**Library Usage**
There is no explicit library mentioned in the Benchmark Definition or test cases. However, some libraries like `numjs` or `mathjs` might be used for mathematical operations, but their usage is not evident from the provided information.

**Special JS Features or Syntax**
No special JavaScript features or syntax are being tested in this benchmark. The tests only involve basic exponentiation operations.

**Alternatives**

* Other alternatives to measure performance could include:
	+ Different arithmetic operations (e.g., addition, multiplication, division)
	+ More complex mathematical expressions
	+ Additional browser and device configurations
	+ Using a different type of input data (e.g., strings instead of numbers)

In summary, this benchmark aims to compare the performance of exponentiation orders in JavaScript using Chrome Mobile 89 on Android 8.1.0 devices. The results will help identify which order yields faster execution times, providing valuable insights into real-world performance scenarios.

Related benchmarks:

testing power (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: 1 vs 2

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

** 1

** 2

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):

testing power (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: ** 1 vs ** 2

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

** 1

** 2

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):

Comparing performance of: 1 vs 2