Benchmark: lodash compact vs es6 compact/filter

HTML Preparation code:


<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var data = [null, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, null, null, null, 3, 4,5, 6, 34,341,2,2,2,1,212,21212,34,1,3112, null];
var compact = (arr) => arr.filter((o) => !!o);

Tests:

lodash compact
_.compact(data);
compact helper fn
compact(data);
es6 filter fn
data.filter((o) => !!o);
es6 filter fn boolean
data.filter(Boolean)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
lodash compact
compact helper fn
es6 filter fn
es6 filter fn boolean

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 6 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU OS 16_6 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) CriOS/118.0.5993.69 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1

Browser/OS: Chrome Mobile iOS 118 on iOS 16.6

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
lodash compact	3406978.0 Ops/sec
compact helper fn	2690541.0 Ops/sec
es6 filter fn	3049522.0 Ops/sec
es6 filter fn boolean	1897430.0 Ops/sec

lodash compact vs es6 compact/filter (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: lodash compact vs compact helper fn vs es6 filter fn vs es6 filter fn boolean

Created: 3 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

lodash compact

compact helper fn

es6 filter fn

es6 filter fn boolean

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A