var x = Math.pow(1.1,10);
var x = Math.pow(1.1,100);
var x = Math.pow(1.1,1000);
var x = Math.pow(2,1000);
var x = Math.pow(1.1,10000);
var x = Math.pow(73,10000);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
1.1**10 | |
1.1**100 | |
1.1**1000 | |
2**1000 | |
1.1**10000 | |
73**10000 |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
1.1**10 | 8457632.0 Ops/sec |
1.1**100 | 8365982.5 Ops/sec |
1.1**1000 | 8353663.0 Ops/sec |
2**1000 | 8379389.0 Ops/sec |
1.1**10000 | 8386998.0 Ops/sec |
73**10000 | 8474376.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of MeasureThat.net and explore what's being tested on this provided JSON.
What is being tested?
MeasureThat.net is designed to test the performance of JavaScript engines in various mathematical operations, specifically exponentiation (Math.pow()
). The benchmark consists of a series of individual test cases, each representing a specific exponentiation operation (e.g., 1.1**10
, 2**1000
, etc.). These test cases are intended to measure how efficiently different browsers and devices can execute these operations.
Options compared
The main options being compared in this benchmark are:
These variations aim to identify performance differences between different browsers and devices under varying conditions.
Pros and cons of each approach
Library usage
In the provided benchmark definition JSON, the Math.pow()
function is used to perform exponentiation operations. The Math
library is a built-in JavaScript library that provides various mathematical functions, including pow()
. Its purpose is to provide a way to raise a number to a power.
Special JS features or syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in the provided benchmark definition JSON. However, it's worth noting that MeasureThat.net might use other libraries or tools for tasks like HTML preparation code or device platform detection, but these are not relevant to the specific benchmark being tested.
Other alternatives
If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches to benchmarking JavaScript performance, consider:
Keep in mind that each of these tools has its own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice ultimately depends on your specific use case and requirements.