Benchmark: Intl.DateTimeFormat.format2

Script Preparation code:

var DATE_TIME_OPTIONS = {
  hour: 'numeric',
  minute: 'numeric',
  year: 'numeric',
  month: '2-digit',
  day: '2-digit',
};

var date = new Date(1234567890123);

Tests:

Intl.DateTimeFormat.format
Intl.DateTimeFormat('en-US', DATE_TIME_OPTIONS).format(date);
toLocaleString
date.toLocaleString()
toString
date.toString()

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Intl.DateTimeFormat.format
toLocaleString
toString

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_13_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/89.0.4389.91 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 89 on Mac OS X 10.13.6

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Intl.DateTimeFormat.format	3161.0 Ops/sec
toLocaleString	132165.7 Ops/sec
toString	381139.9 Ops/sec

Intl.DateTimeFormat.format2 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Intl.DateTimeFormat.format vs toLocaleString vs toString

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Intl.DateTimeFormat.format

toLocaleString

toString

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A