var a = 'true';
var b = true;
JSON.parse(a)
var res = a === 'true' ? true : a;
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
JSON | |
Condition |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
JSON | 1597890.1 Ops/sec |
Condition | 6379356.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is defined by two test cases:
JSON.parse(a)
var res = a === 'true' ? true : a;
These test cases are designed to compare the performance of parsing JSON data versus using a conditional statement to achieve the same result.
Options being compared:
a === 'true' ? true : a;
): An alternative approach that uses a conditional statement to evaluate the condition and return true
if it's met, or use the original value a
otherwise.Pros and Cons of each approach:
a === 'true' ? true : a;
):a
is a boolean value)Library used:
There is no explicitly mentioned library being used in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that the use of JSON.parse()
relies on the built-in JavaScript JSON
object, which provides a standardized way to work with JSON data.
Special JS feature or syntax:
The test case uses the ternary operator (?:
) to implement the conditional statement. The ternary operator is a shorthand syntax for simple conditional statements and can be useful in certain situations.
Other alternatives:
If you were to rewrite this benchmark, you could also consider testing:
lodash
or json-stringify-safe
to parse JSON dataa === 1 ? true : a;
)if-else
, switch-case
, etc.)Overall, this benchmark provides a simple and straightforward comparison between two approaches to evaluating a condition. It's a useful exercise for developers to consider the trade-offs between explicitness, readability, and performance when writing code.