Benchmark: memo vs no-memo vs incorrect- memo

HTML Preparation code:

<div id="root"></div>

<script src="https://unpkg.com/react@16/umd/react.development.js"></script>
<script src="https://unpkg.com/react-dom@16/umd/react-dom.development.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:



var NoMemo = function({children}) {
  return React.createElement("div", { children: children });
}

var Memo = React.memo(NoMemo)

var StringChild = function () {return 'children'}

var DivChild = function () {
  return React.createElement('div', {}, 'children', ' in ', ' div');
}
var root = document.getElementById('root');

Tests:

NoMemo - string child
ReactDOM.render(React.createElement(NoMemo, {}, StringChild()), root);
Memo - string child
ReactDOM.render(React.createElement(Memo, {}, StringChild()), root);
Memo - instance child
ReactDOM.render(React.createElement(Memo, {}, DivChild()), root);
NoMemo - instance child
ReactDOM.render(React.createElement(NoMemo, {}, DivChild()), root);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
NoMemo - string child
Memo - string child
Memo - instance child
NoMemo - instance child

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

The provided JSON represents a JavaScript benchmark test case for React, a popular JavaScript library for building user interfaces. The test case compares the performance of two approaches: memoization and non-memoization.

**Memoization vs Non-Memoization**

In this context, memoization refers to the optimization technique used by React's `React.memo()` function. Memoization is an optimization technique where the result of a function or operation is cached so that subsequent calls with the same input return the cached result instead of recalculating it.

In the benchmark test case, two functions are defined: `NoMemo` and `Memo`. The `NoMemo` function does not use memoization, while the `Memo` function uses React's `React.memo()` to enable memoization.

**Options Compared**

The benchmark test cases compare the performance of the following options:

1. **NoMemo - string child**: This option renders a React component with a string child using the non-memoized `NoMemo` function.
2. **Memo - string child**: This option renders a React component with a string child using the memoized `Memo` function.
3. **Memo - instance child**: This option renders a React component with an instance child using the memoized `Memo` function.
4. **NoMemo - instance child**: This option renders a React component with an instance child using the non-memoized `NoMemo` function.

**Pros and Cons**

* **Memoization (Memo)**:
	+ Pros: Can significantly improve performance by avoiding unnecessary re-renders of components when their props or children do not change.
	+ Cons: May increase memory usage due to caching, and may require additional effort to implement correctly.
* **Non-Memoization (NoMemo)**:
	+ Pros: Does not increase memory usage and is easier to understand and implement.
	+ Cons: Can lead to unnecessary re-renders of components, which can negatively impact performance.

**Library and Its Purpose**

The `React` library is a JavaScript library for building user interfaces. In this benchmark test case, React is used to define two functions: `NoMemo` and `Memo`. The `React.memo()` function enables memoization for the `Memo` function, allowing it to cache the results of its computations.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax**

The benchmark test case uses a special JavaScript feature called **function destructuring**, which allows for concise definition of function parameters. In this case, the `NoMemo` and `Memo` functions use object destructuring to extract the `children` property from the input object.

**Other Alternatives**

If you're interested in optimizing your React application, here are some other alternatives you might consider:

1. **Use caching libraries**: Consider using caching libraries like Redis or Memcached to store the results of expensive computations.
2. **Optimize rendering**: Optimize rendering by using techniques like `React.PureComponent` or `shouldComponentUpdate()`.
3. **Avoid unnecessary re-renders**: Avoid unnecessary re-renders by using techniques like `useCallback()` and `useMemo()`.

Keep in mind that the best approach will depend on your specific use case and requirements.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/86.0.4240.198 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 86 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
NoMemo - string child	13561.3 Ops/sec
Memo - string child	17540.5 Ops/sec
Memo - instance child	12377.3 Ops/sec
NoMemo - instance child	12355.1 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

memo vs no-memo vs incorrect- memo (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: NoMemo - string child vs Memo - string child vs Memo - instance child vs NoMemo - instance child

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

NoMemo - string child

Memo - string child

Memo - instance child

NoMemo - instance child

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):