var testObj = {}
for (let i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
const randomString = Math.random().toString(36).substr(2, 5);
testObj[randomString] = randomString;
}
let output;
for (const key in testObj) {
output = testObj[key];
console.log(output);
break;
}
let output;
output = Object.values(testObj)[0];
console.log(output);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
for in break | |
Object keys |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
for in break | 1283.1 Ops/sec |
Object keys | 457.4 Ops/sec |
What is being tested?
The provided JSON represents two JavaScript microbenchmarks, "for in break vs object keys", which test the performance difference between using a traditional for...in
loop with a break
statement and accessing an object's values directly using the Object.keys()
method.
Options compared:
Two approaches are being compared:
for...in
loop with break
:for...in
, which returns both own enumerable and non-enumerable properties, including inherited ones.Object.keys()
:Object.keys()
method to get an array of the object's own enumerable property names.testObj[key]
).Pros and cons of each approach:
for...in
loop with break
:Object.keys()
:Library used:
None explicitly mentioned. The Object.keys()
method is a built-in JavaScript function that does not rely on any external libraries.
Special JS feature/syntax:
None mentioned.
Other alternatives:
If you need to compare the performance of accessing an object's values using different methods, consider these additional approaches:
for...of
loop: This approach iterates over the array-like properties of the object using a for...of
loop, which provides a more modern and concise way to iterate over arrays.Object.values()
method: Similar to Object.keys()
, but returns an array containing all values of an object's own enumerable properties.Array.prototype.forEach()
or Array.prototype.reduce()
methods: These approaches can be used to iterate over the object's property names and values, providing more control over the iteration process.When choosing between these alternatives, consider your specific use case, performance requirements, and personal preference for syntax and semantics.