<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
const allDivs = document.querySelectorAll('div');
const allDivs = document.getElementsByTagName('div');
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
querySelectorAll | |
getElementsByTagName |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
querySelectorAll | 1690412.4 Ops/sec |
getElementsByTagName | 4742898.5 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks!
Benchmark Description
The provided JSON represents a benchmark test case that compares two approaches to retrieve all HTML elements with the tag name "div": document.querySelectorAll('div')
and document.getElementsByTagName('div')
.
Options Compared
Two options are being compared:
getElementsByName()
API and returns an HTMLCollection containing all elements with the specified tag name.Pros and Cons
getElementsByTagName
.querySelectorAll
.In modern JavaScript environments, querySelectorAll
is generally recommended due to its efficiency and flexibility.
Library Used
Neither of these methods relies on a specific library. They are built-in browser APIs.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
The QuerySelector API (used by querySelectorAll
) uses a CSS selector syntax, which allows for more flexible and expressive selections. For example: document.querySelectorAll('div div')
would match all elements with both the tag name "div" and at least one child element.
Other Considerations
Element.prototype.slice.call()
: querySelectorAll
returns an HTMLCollection, while getElementsByTagName
returns an array-like object. This can lead to inconsistencies in certain situations.querySelectorAll
is generally faster and more efficient than getElementsByTagName
. However, the actual performance difference may vary depending on the specific use case and browser implementation.Alternatives
If you're looking for alternative methods to retrieve all elements with a specific tag name, consider using:
document.querySelectorAll('div')
.Keep in mind that these alternatives might have different performance characteristics and may not be supported by all browsers.